For K-12 districts
Find out where your district actually stands on AI
Ask every teacher and staff member, score nine weighted dimensions, and walk into the next board meeting with evidence instead of anecdotes.
What people usually need this for
- The board has asked what the district is doing about AI, and the honest answer is currently "it depends who you ask".
- You need an AI policy, and you would rather write it from what your own staff report than from a template someone else wrote.
- Teachers are already using AI. Nobody has measured how, where, or with what guardrails.
- You are planning next year’s professional learning and need to know where the gaps actually are.
- A grant or state requirement asks you to document readiness, and you need something defensible.
What gets measured
9 weighted dimensions. The weighting is published in full on the framework page, along with how to run it yourself.
Curriculum & Instruction15%
AI Infrastructure & Technology13.5%
Educator Readiness & Development13.5%
Equity & Access13.5%
Workforce Alignment11.3%
Data Governance & Ethics10.5%
Student Support & Services7.5%
District Strategy & Leadership7.5%
Culture & Overall Readiness7.5%
What you end up with
- A scored report across nine weighted dimensions, with the spread as well as the average.
- A board-ready PDF written for people who were not in the room when the survey ran.
- A 30/60/90 day governance roadmap: what to decide, who owns it, by when.
- Decision briefs for the choices that need one, written in district language.
- A baseline you can re-run next year to show movement.
What it costs
From $6,000 a year, priced per organization by size. Nothing is charged per seat or per response — surveying more people makes the analysis better, so we do not charge you for it.
See pricingLooking for the colleges and universities version? It is here.