For colleges and universities
Find out where your institution actually stands on AI
Ask faculty and staff across every department, score nine weighted dimensions, and bring the cabinet evidence rather than impressions.
What people usually need this for
- Leadership has asked for an AI strategy and nobody can say what the current baseline is.
- AI use is uneven across departments, and the difference has never been measured.
- An accreditation review or strategic plan needs a documented position on AI.
- You are allocating professional development budget and guessing where it should go.
- Policy exists on paper but nobody knows whether it reached the people teaching.
What gets measured
9 weighted dimensions. The weighting is published in full on the framework page, along with how to run it yourself.
Curriculum & Pedagogy15%
AI Infrastructure & Technology13.5%
Faculty Readiness & Development13.5%
Equity & Access13.5%
Workforce Alignment11.3%
Data Governance & Ethics10.5%
Student Support & Services7.5%
Institutional Strategy & Leadership7.5%
Culture & Overall Readiness7.5%
What you end up with
- A scored report across nine weighted dimensions, with departmental spread, not just an institutional average.
- A board-ready PDF written for trustees who were not part of the process.
- A 30/60/90 day governance roadmap with named owners and approval routes.
- Decision briefs for choices that need a documented rationale.
- A baseline you can re-run to demonstrate progress.
What it costs
From $9,000 a year, priced per organization by size. Nothing is charged per seat or per response — surveying more people makes the analysis better, so we do not charge you for it.
See pricingLooking for the K-12 district version? It is here.